This article seeks to provoke that human resource management (HRM), both as an academic field of study and as a form of professional practice, is at risk of impoverishment. The main reasoning for this is because of ideological individualism and marketisation with an attendant neglect on wider organisational, employee, and societal concerns. Following a review of the context of financialised capitalism, three contemporary developments in HRM are used to illustrate the argument: reward strategies, talent management, and high performance work systems. Implications for the practice of HRM and the way the subject area is taught in mainstream business schools are considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prior work has questioned whether human resource management (HRM) lives up to the organizational benefits it espouses. The intentions underlying human resource (HR) practices often differ from how they are implemented by line managers or how they are ultimately perceived by followers, thus undermining the strength of the HR system in influencing organizational outcomes and with them the overall reputation of HRM. We argue that line managers, specifically those who display authentic leadership behaviors, can strengthen an HR system (i.e., aligning intended, actual, and perceived HR policies and practices) by implementing HR practices in a way that they are perceived as distinct, consistent, and reflecting consensus. Authentic leadership theory departs from more traditional, top-down fit perspectives in strategic HRM to consider the dynamic way in which individuals within an organizational context co-create felt and perceived authenticity in interaction with others. In other words, by providing a more dynamic approach to creating alignment in HRM, authentic leadership helps HRM attain more authenticity and credibility in the organization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While the problem of the gap between espoused and implemented HR practices has been widely recognized in the past, consideration of the role that leaders, and particularly direct managers, play in implementing HRM has not been well defined. In an effort to close this gap, we argue that more attention needs to be paid to the critical role of managers, as they are the ones who shape employees' climate perceptions by interpreting and providing meaning about the intended messages of HR practices as they relate to the specific job expectations of employees. In particular, we identify four HR implementation leader behaviors for facilitating a strong HR system. We expect that when leaders verbally articulate the intended meanings and expectations, role model desired behaviors, reinforce preferred behaviors, and assess followers' interpretations of the provided meanings so that further adjustments can be made in the meaning-making process, that cohesive climate perceptions that drive a strong HR system will ensue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The implementation of effective human resource (HR) practices typically rests with line managers. This paper uses social context theory to propose that line manager HR implementation is influenced by organizational culture, climate, and political considerations. Subsequently, HR implementation is anticipated to drive employee outcomes. This model's implications and future research directions also are discussed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Employees' reactions to organizational change are affected by transformational leaders, who foster employees' readiness for and commitment to change and motivate them to act in support of the change. However, just how transformational leadership affects employees remains unclear. To address this gap in knowledge, the present study analyses work engagement and the perceived consequences of a change (valence) as motivational mechanisms that explain the influence of transformational leaders on employees' behaviour during change. The study engaged 328 employees who were experiencing organizational change to complete a survey and used structural equation modelling for data analysis. Results show that work engagement and valence function as mediators in the relationship between transformational leadership and employee behaviour during change, so two motivational mechanisms are identified that shed light on the leadership process. Transformational leadership increases employees' work engagement and perceptions of attractive change consequences, subsequently evoking employee behaviour in support of change. In doing so, the study expands the research on the role of transformational leadership during organizational change and helps to sensitize managers about how they can positively influence employees in the course of organizational change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: While theory and research on leaders and leadership abound, followers and followership theory have been given short shrift. It is accepted wisdom that there is no leadership without followers, yet followers are very often left out of the leadership research equation. Fortunately this problem is being addressed in recent research, with more attention being paid to the role of followership in the leadership process. The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic review of the followership literature, and from this review, introduce a broad theory of followership into leadership research. Based on our review, we identify two theoretical frameworks for the study of followership, one from a role-based approach (“reversing the lens”) and one from a constructionist approach (“the leadership process”). These frameworks are used to outline directions for future research. We conclude with a discussion of conceptual and methodological issues in the study of followership theory. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]